Munich: In the boardrooms of Bavaria’s export champions, one line in the Union’s budget plan draws particular alarm. The European Commission wants large companies to pay directly into the EU budget through a new levy, and the fight over these own resources is sharpening.
The proposal, part of the Commission’s blueprint for the 2028 to 2034 budget, would ask firms with annual turnover above EUR 100 million to make a fixed yearly payment. The contribution, dubbed the Corporate Resource for Europe, would range from EUR 100,000 to EUR 750,000 depending on a company’s size.
Brussels expects the levy to raise about EUR 6.8 billion a year. It sits within a wider package of own resources that also taps emissions trading revenue, a carbon border charge and tobacco duties. Together they are meant to help repay the Union’s pandemic-era debt and fund new priorities.
That debt is the pressure behind the whole exercise. Repayments on the NextGenerationEU recovery fund come due from the end of 2026, and without fresh revenue the burden falls on national contributions that capitals are loath to raise.
The corporate levy has drawn the fiercest opposition. Germany’s chancellor has flatly rejected the idea, arguing the Union has no legal basis to tax companies. Business lobbies call it a turnover tax in disguise that would fall on firms whether or not they turn a profit.
Economists have piled on too. Analysts warn that a charge tied to turnover rather than profit hits low-margin businesses hardest and could distort competition, and several have questioned whether the design would survive a challenge in the Union’s courts.
Yet the Commission holds a strong card. Every euro it fails to raise from new own resources must come from member states, and finance ministers dislike that prospect even more than they dislike the levy. That tension will drive the bargaining.
The procedure raises the bar further. New own resources need the unanimous backing of all member states and ratification by every national parliament, a gauntlet that has sunk ambitious revenue ideas before. A single capital, or even a single chamber, can stall the whole design.
The Parliament, meanwhile, has pushed for an even larger budget and pressed capitals to accept ambitious new revenue. One analysis of the five proposed resources lays out how far apart the sides remain. With agreement sought before the end of 2026, the coming months will test whether Europe can agree on who pays.




