Limerick: The Digital Networks Act takes centre stage on 12 and 13 October 2026, when EU telecommunications ministers gather in Limerick for an informal meeting under the Irish Presidency. Patrick O’Donovan, Ireland’s Minister for Culture, Communications and Sport, will chair the talks. Ministers from EFTA states and Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen will join the discussion.
The Presidency calls the meeting an exchange of views, and it wants to advance a common understanding on key aspects of the Digital Networks Act. Informal meetings adopt no legal acts, but they let ministers test positions before formal negotiations. The Limerick agenda follows a meeting of directors general for communications held last month, and it also covers subsea cable connectivity, resilience, digital connectivity and consumer protection.
The Commission designed the Digital Networks Act as a regulation, not a directive, so it would apply directly and align rules across the Union. It would replace the European Electronic Communications Code, the BEREC Regulation and the Radio Spectrum Policy Programme, and it would take over parts of the Open Internet Regulation and the ePrivacy Directive. In effect, it rewrites the telecoms rulebook.
Several features explain why ministers care. The text extends the general authorisation regime to certain providers, potentially including submarine cable operators, and it creates a Union Preparedness Plan for Digital Infrastructures to strengthen resilience. It also gives more weight to spectrum and satellite authorisation through greater coordination at EU level, and it simplifies end-user rules, including contract transparency requirements.
The sharpest disputes concern power. Governments disagree on how far the Union should centralise decisions on spectrum and satellites, and on how much authority EU bodies should hold compared with national regulators. The Irish Presidency has made the Digital Networks Act its flagship telecoms file and plans to broker compromises on those questions, as well as on how quickly operators obtain authorisations.
Transparency rules form a second fault line. Some governments want detailed, comparable contract information, while operators warn that granular reporting adds cost. The text also has to line up with cybersecurity and critical entities rules that already govern network security.
Limerick will not settle these issues, because informal meetings take no votes. The meeting should still show which capitals back centralised spectrum management and which defend national control. For operators planning investment in fibre, satellites and subsea links, that signal will matter, because the Digital Networks Act would set licensing and spectrum conditions for years. The Digital Networks Act moves into its decisive Council phase once ministers return home.





