Riga: The European Anti-Fraud Office published its annual report on 20 April, recording recommendations to recover almost 600 million euros of misused EU funds during the 2025 reporting year. The headline figure is precisely 597 million euros in recoveries plus a further 18 million euros prevented from being misspent, a combined preventive and corrective impact that the office’s leadership describes as the strongest single-year result of the current Commission term.
Behind the headline are 254 new investigations opened during the year and 209 closed. The case-handling pace is roughly steady against the prior year, but the composition of investigations has shifted. Cross-border illicit trade and customs violations rose as a share of the caseload, partly because OLAF investigators continued their work supporting Ukrainian customs and law enforcement authorities with both training and operational assistance. Procurement manipulation and conflict-of-interest cases also climbed, reflecting the office’s focus on funds disbursed under the Recovery and Resilience Facility, where rapid disbursement timelines have produced their own set of integrity risks.
Of the 416 financial, judicial, disciplinary and administrative recommendations issued during the year, the office reports that 216 were directed at competent authorities at EU and national level for follow-up. Sanctions decisions, suspension of payments, and referral to national prosecutors all sit within that volume. OLAF’s parallel relationship with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office in Luxembourg has continued to mature, with joint workstreams running across multiple Member States and a clearer division of labour over which cases sit best inside criminal prosecution and which inside administrative recovery.
The environmental fraud strand received particular attention in the 2025 report. OLAF investigators tracked cases involving falsified compliance documentation for waste shipments, fraudulent recycling claims and irregularities in carbon-related compliance regimes. Those investigations matter both for the immediate budgetary loss and because the EU’s Green Deal architecture leans heavily on accurate reporting from operators along compliance chains. A fraudulent input distorts both the budget and the policy signal, and investigators have begun building cross-DG referral channels with DG Environment and DG Climate to shorten the time between detection and corrective action.
The sanctions-circumvention dossier remains substantial. OLAF continues to investigate the circumvention of EU restrictive measures against Russia and Belarus, with the office’s work feeding into Council files and into the operational picture that Customs and border agencies use to inform risk-based controls. The case mix on this strand has shifted away from straightforward re-exports through third countries toward more sophisticated invoicing and ownership-layer arrangements that take longer to unravel. The investigative work is resource-intensive, and the office has flagged that the next iteration of its own internal organisation will probably need to allocate more case-handling capacity to that strand.
The long-term tally is the part of the report that policymakers in Member States read most carefully. Over the last decade, OLAF investigations have led to the recovery of 6.8 billion euros to the EU budget and have prevented a further 873 million euros from being unduly spent. That decadal record is the strongest single argument the office can deploy in the discussions over the next multiannual financial framework, where the institutional case for anti-fraud capacity will sit alongside debates over staff numbers, digital tools and the relationship with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. For Latvian and Baltic officials who have hosted joint OLAF operations on sanctions and customs files, the 597 million headline is also a reminder that the office’s reach is sustained as much by national cooperation as by Brussels-based investigation.




