Fake components are no longer a problem confined to knock-off handbags and pirated films. As Europe’s anti-fraud investigators gathered at the end of June, their message was that counterfeiting has crept into the machinery that keeps the continent running, from aircraft and vehicles to power grids and communication networks. The European Anti-Fraud Office and the EU Intellectual Property Office convened a two-day conference in Alicante on 30 June and 1 July, pointedly titled “Securing Europe’s Backbone,” to confront counterfeiting in critical and high-risk sectors.
The guest list signalled how serious the threat has become. More than 50 participants attended, including customs authorities from across the Union and international bodies such as the International Atomic Energy Agency and the European Union Aviation Safety Agency. So did the companies with the most to lose: Apple, Cisco, Nokia, Microsoft, Infineon, Volvo Group, ZF Group, Schaeffler, Danfoss, Chemours and Chiesi. When counterfeit parts reach aircraft, cars or infrastructure, the danger is not lost sales but failed brakes, faulty chips and compromised safety systems.
Officials were blunt that this is not a victimless crime. Fakes in transport systems, critical infrastructure and telecommunications can disrupt essential services, endanger public safety and erode the economic resilience that Europe is trying to rebuild. A counterfeit truck part that fails at speed, or a substandard component buried in a power substation, carries consequences that ripple far beyond the balance sheet of the brand being copied.
The gathering fits a wider push. Only weeks earlier, in June, the anti-fraud office helped Portuguese authorities dismantle a trade in counterfeit truck parts, one of a run of operations aimed at automotive and industrial fakes. And the office’s most recent annual report, covering 2025, underscored the scale of the fight: investigators recommended recovering almost 600 million euros in misused funds, opened 254 new cases and closed 209, part of a decade in which 6.8 billion euros have been clawed back to the EU budget.
Why it matters is a question of trust and safety as much as money. The single market depends on the assumption that a certified part is what it claims to be, and that assumption weakens every time a fake slips through customs. As supply chains lengthen and more goods arrive as small parcels, the entry points multiply, which is one reason the office is knitting closer ties with customs services and industry rather than acting alone.
What comes next is whether cooperation translates into interception. Conferences produce commitments; the harder work is intelligence-sharing that stops shipments at the border and prosecutions that deter the networks behind them. The office also flags a structural strain, having lost 110 permanent posts over 15 years, which raises a pointed question about whether Europe is resourcing the guardians it keeps asking to do more. For now, the alliance with the intellectual-property office is a bet that pooling data and expertise can protect the parts holding Europe’s economy together.




