Cologne: EASA’s first compliance snapshot of the ReFuelEU Aviation regulation lands this week with a number that will frustrate ambition hawks and reassure infrastructure planners in roughly equal measure. Year one of the bloc-wide sustainable aviation fuel mandate produced a 1.4 percent SAF share across the 56 reporting hubs, just half a point above the 2 percent legal floor for 2025 in volume terms but well below the 6 percent target carriers had voluntarily flagged in their 2024 fuel plans. The agency’s report, prepared with Eurocontrol’s traffic teams, breaks the figure down by hub and confirms that the mandate is, for now, holding together as a compliance instrument rather than as a market accelerator.
The dispersion is the more revealing detail. Frankfurt, Amsterdam Schiphol and Paris Charles de Gaulle all cleared the 2 percent floor with margin, posting 2.7, 2.4 and 2.3 percent respectively, helped by long-term offtake from Neste’s Rotterdam refinery and TotalEnergies’ Grandpuits hydroprocessed plant. Southern hubs lag, with Madrid Barajas booking 0.9 percent, Athens posting 0.7 percent, and Cyprus’s Larnaca reporting a 0.4 percent share with a written derogation on logistical grounds. The Polish ministry has already signalled it will dispute the EASA finding for Warsaw Chopin, where a port-side accounting mismatch dropped the reported share to 1.1 percent.
Carriers’ anti-tankering compliance, the second pillar of the regulation, appears closer to working as designed. Eurocontrol’s flight-plan audits across the year flagged just 4.2 percent of intra-EU rotations as potentially carrying excess fuel for cost arbitrage with non-EU hubs, down from the 7.1 percent estimate the agency presented at the regulation’s drafting stage. The drop is partly procedural and partly market-driven, with the post-July 2025 jet fuel price convergence between Singapore and Rotterdam removing some of the original incentive.
The ramp to 6 percent SAF by 2030 and 20 percent by 2035 will require the offtake curve to bend hard. The Commission’s Innovation Fund auction round seven, closing this autumn, has earmarked 1.7 billion euros for synthetic kerosene and second-generation HEFA capacity, with at least four French and three Iberian projects in the pipeline. ENGIE’s Le Havre proposal, which combines green hydrogen with biogenic CO2 from cement off-take, is the largest single bid by capacity and has drawn an unusual letter of support from the airline lobby A4E. Most projects, however, depend on power purchase agreements that themselves depend on offshore wind buildout slipping under control.
The Commission’s two-year review clause, written into the regulation at trilogue, falls due in 2027. EASA has begun briefing capitals that the first hard policy decision will be whether to bring forward the synthetic aviation fuel sub-target. The 1.2 percent floor for 2030 currently feels modest against the Innovation Fund pipeline but ambitious against grid and water permitting in the Iberian projects. Industry analysts at Argus and ICIS expect the sub-target to be the central trilogue fight of the next mandate.
Travellers will start to see the cost pass-through in the second half of this year. IATA’s fare basket for intra-EU routes has lifted 0.9 percent on the SAF surcharge basis, and Ryanair has begun itemising the line on tickets, a transparency move regulators have welcomed but legacy carriers have resisted. Eurocontrol’s economic team estimates the 2025 cost pass-through at roughly 1.40 euros per intra-EU sector, with significant carrier variation.
EASA’s recommendation is structural rather than punitive. The agency is asking the Commission to bring forward the regulation’s mid-term reporting cycle so that hub-level data lands in March rather than May, giving fuel suppliers a clearer planning runway for the 2027 cliff. The Commission has not yet taken a position but is expected to consult informally over the summer. Year one is in the books. Year two carries the harder questions.




