Budapest: A new round of European Union money for the groups that defend rights, equality and democracy is opening, and for much of the continent’s civil society it could hardly come at a more anxious moment. The Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values programme, the bloc’s main instrument for funding non-governmental organisations, has begun publishing its 2026 calls for proposals on the Union’s central funding portal, with further opportunities promised in the months ahead.
The sums, while modest beside the Union’s farm or cohesion budgets, reach corners of public life that little else touches. Roughly €27 million is earmarked this round for work on gender equality, anti-discrimination, Roma inclusion, children’s rights and data protection, while around €76 million is set aside for town twinning, networks of towns, European remembrance and broader civic participation. Across its full 2021-2027 lifespan the programme commands some €1.5 billion, channelled to organisations operating at local, regional, national and transnational level and administered through the Union’s education and culture executive agency.
The programme’s purpose is unusually explicit for an EU funding line: to protect and promote the rights and values written into the Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights. In practice that means underwriting the small associations that monitor courts, support minorities, run memorial projects or simply bring citizens of different countries together. For many such groups, particularly in member states where domestic funding for rights work has dried up or grown politically fraught, CERV grants are not a supplement but a lifeline.
That dependence is also the source of unease. Civil-society umbrella bodies have warned that the next long-term EU budget, now entering its decisive design phase, could fold the programme into a larger fund or trim its dedicated strands, diluting an instrument they regard as a hard-won guarantee. Their fear is that values funding, lacking the powerful constituencies that defend agricultural or regional spending, is precisely the kind of line that quietly shrinks when negotiators hunt for savings.
Defenders of consolidation make the opposite case. A sprawling map of small programmes, they argue, is costly to run and hard for applicants to navigate, and folding overlapping funds together could in principle deliver more money to the front line rather than to administration. The dispute, in other words, is less about whether Europe should support civil society than about how to do so without burying it in bureaucracy or exposing it to political whim.
For now the immediate business is practical. Organisations from Budapest to Lisbon will spend the coming weeks assembling partnerships and drafting bids against the published deadlines, the unglamorous spadework on which the visible defence of European values quietly rests. The larger question of the programme’s future will be settled at a different table, in the negotiations over the Union’s next budget, where the price of democracy is weighed against everything else the bloc is asked to fund.




