Tallinn: In a country where cash has become an oddity and public services run almost entirely online, the idea of a central-bank digital currency provokes less anxiety than it does in much of the Union. That gap in national temperament helps explain why the digital euro remains one of Europe’s most contested financial projects, and why a committee vote in late June counted as genuine progress rather than a formality.
On 23 June the European Parliament’s economic and monetary affairs committee adopted its position on the legislation that would establish the digital euro, backing the file by 43 votes to 14 with one abstention. The vote does not create the currency; it sets Parliament’s negotiating stance for talks with member states, which have been advancing their own position in parallel. Should the co-legislators agree on a regulation during 2026, the European Central Bank has signalled that pilot activity could begin around mid-2027, with a first issuance conceivable in 2029. None of that binds the ECB to actually launch; the final decision on issuance is reserved for a later stage.
The project’s champions describe it as a matter of sovereignty. Europeans increasingly pay with cards and apps routed through a small number of non-European networks, and a public digital currency would give the continent a settlement rail it controls, a hedge against both foreign payment giants and privately issued stablecoins. Its critics, concentrated among commercial banks, fear the opposite kind of disruption: if households can hold money directly at the central bank, deposits could drain out of lenders in a crisis. The legislation tries to defuse that risk with holding limits, though the exact ceiling has become one of the most fought-over numbers in the file.
Privacy is the other flashpoint. Advocates insist the design should preserve something close to the anonymity of cash for small offline payments, while supervisors want enough traceability to satisfy anti-money-laundering rules. Squaring those demands has kept negotiators busy, and the committee text leans toward stronger privacy guarantees than some governments would prefer, setting up a point of friction in the trilogue to come.
For ordinary users, the practical stakes remain abstract. A digital euro would sit alongside cash and bank accounts, usable for everyday purchases and, crucially, functioning offline so that a payment could clear without an internet connection. Whether Europeans embrace it will depend on whether it offers something their existing options do not, a question the institutions have struggled to answer crisply.
The committee vote clears one procedural gate on a road with several still ahead. A plenary vote, a Council position and a lengthy trilogue all remain before the regulation is settled, and even then the ECB would face years of technical work. The single currency’s digital successor is inching forward, but it is still closer to the drawing board than to anyone’s wallet.




