The Hague: The Court of Justice of the European Union has closed a loophole that Kremlin-linked broadcasters hoped to exploit. On 2 July 2026 the judges ruled that the bloc’s sanctions ban on airing Russia Today applies just as firmly to content offered free of charge on an ordinary, publicly accessible website.
The case reached Luxembourg after a national court asked whether the prohibition, adopted under the EU’s restrictive measures against Russia, reached beyond television and satellite feeds. Lawyers for the outlet argued that a website carrying no subscription fee sat outside the wording of the ban. The Court disagreed, holding that the purpose of the measure is to stop the dissemination of state-controlled propaganda, whatever technical channel carries it.
Judges reasoned that a narrow reading would let sanctioned material flow to European audiences through a browser while remaining blocked on a set-top box. That outcome, they found, would drain the sanction of any real effect. The ruling confirms that hosting, mirroring or streaming the outlet’s programming through a free portal counts as prohibited dissemination, and that internet service providers and hosting companies cannot treat such sites as neutral third-party content.
The decision lands as the Union keeps widening its information-security toolkit. Since 2022 the Council has suspended the broadcasting licences of several Russian state channels, and national regulators have chased copycat domains that resurface under new names within days of a takedown. The Court’s language gives those regulators firmer ground, because it ties the ban to the substance of the propaganda rather than to any particular delivery format.
Free-expression groups have watched the litigation closely. They accept that governments may restrict foreign state propaganda during an armed conflict, yet they warn that broad dissemination bans can sweep in journalists who merely quote or analyse the banned material. The judgment tries to answer that worry by anchoring the prohibition in the outlet’s role as an instrument of the Russian state, not in the topics it covers.
For platforms and telecoms operators, the practical message is direct. They must treat a free Russia Today mirror the same way they would treat a paid broadcast, and they cannot lean on the absence of a paywall to argue that ordinary web publishing rules apply. Companies that ignore the ruling risk enforcement action from national authorities that already police the sanctions regime.
The Court publishes its reasoning through the Court of Justice press office, and the outcome will guide how member states handle the next wave of relabelled domains. By reading the ban to follow the content rather than the pipe, the judges have made it harder for sanctioned broadcasters to slip back onto European screens under a lighter-touch legal cover.




