Brussels: For airlines flying out of this northeastern Spanish hub, and for the airports issuing their permits, the rules on how aviation emissions are counted under Europe’s carbon market were supposed to have changed months ago. They have not, and now both Spain and Poland are headed to the EU’s top court over it.
In its regular package of infringement decisions issued on 4 June, the European Commission referred Spain and Poland to the Court of Justice of the EU and requested that the court impose financial penalties, after both countries failed to communicate national measures transposing the revised aviation provisions of the EU Emissions Trading System directive. The package also included reasoned opinions, a step short of a court referral, against other member states over separate energy efficiency transposition failures.
The ETS reform at issue extends and tightens the carbon price applied to flights, part of the broader overhaul of the bloc’s flagship carbon market that also introduced a new emissions trading scheme for buildings and road transport fuels. Airlines operating intra-European routes have been subject to ETS obligations for years, but the revised rules adjust free allowance phase-outs and reporting requirements in ways that require changes to national implementing law, changes the Commission says Spain and Poland have simply not made.
Referral to the Court of Justice with a request for financial sanctions is one of the more serious tools in the Commission’s enforcement kit, reserved for cases where a member state has missed a transposition deadline without communicating any measures at all, as opposed to having transposed late or incompletely. If the court agrees, both countries could face a lump sum payment and a daily penalty that continues to accrue until transposition is complete, calculated based on the country’s economic weight and the duration and seriousness of the breach.
Spanish officials have not publicly disputed the substance of the Commission’s case, attributing the delay to the legislative backlog created by a string of other EU directives requiring transposition around the same time, including rules on energy efficiency and renewable energy targets that Spain has prioritised. Poland’s government has linked the delay to its broader, often fraught relationship with the ETS, which has faced political resistance domestically over its effect on electricity prices for households still partly reliant on coal-fired generation.
The case adds to a growing list of ETS-related friction between the Commission and national capitals as the carbon market’s scope expands. Industry groups in the aviation sector say the uncertainty created by inconsistent national transposition makes it harder to plan for compliance costs that ultimately feed into ticket prices, while environmental groups argue that delays in transposition translate directly into delayed emissions reductions, since allowance allocations and reporting obligations cannot be enforced under outdated national rules.
For now, the cases move to Luxembourg, where the Court of Justice will set a timeline for both governments to respond. Commission officials say similar referrals over ETS transposition have historically taken twelve to eighteen months to reach a ruling, meaning any financial penalties are unlikely to bite before 2027, even as the underlying obligations themselves are already supposed to be in force.




