Aachen: In the border city where Charlemagne once held court and where modern Europe likes to trace its origins, the idea that towns separated by national frontiers should befriend one another has deep roots. The European Union is again putting money behind it. Its Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values programme has reopened the calls that fund town-twinning and civic exchange, the unglamorous machinery of European integration that operates far below the level of summits and directives.
The town-twinning strand invites municipalities to pair up across borders and run projects that bring ordinary residents together, around shared history, local democracy, migration, climate or simply the business of running a town. Applications for the 2026 town-twinning call run until 23 September, while a separate remembrance strand, which funds projects reflecting on Europe’s difficult twentieth-century history, stays open into October. Across its civic-engagement activities the programme has roughly 76 million euro available this year, modest by EU standards but significant for the small organisations that rely on it.
The premise behind the funding is that European identity is not built only in Brussels institutions but in church halls, school exchanges and visits between sister cities. Town-twinning began in earnest after the Second World War as a deliberate act of reconciliation, knitting together communities that had recently been at war. The EU now treats that grassroots tradition as a tool against a more contemporary threat: the disengagement, polarisation and democratic fatigue that have eroded faith in the European project from within.
For a place like Aachen, perched where Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands meet, cross-border civic life is not a policy abstraction but a daily reality. The CERV calls are designed to make that experience reproducible elsewhere, funding networks of towns and one-off twinning events alike. Eligibility is broad: local authorities, civil society groups and other non-profit bodies across member states and associated countries can apply.
Why should a relatively small funding line matter amid the EU’s grander preoccupations? Because the durability of the Union depends partly on whether citizens feel any connection to it, and programmes like this are among the few that touch people directly rather than through regulation. Critics question whether modest grants for town festivals and exchange visits can meaningfully counter the structural forces driving disillusionment, and whether the money might achieve more elsewhere. Supporters argue that civic infrastructure, once lost, is expensive to rebuild, and that small sums sustaining cross-border friendships are a cheap insurance policy for European cohesion.
The next steps fall to applicants. Municipalities and civil society groups will assemble their bids over the summer, the town-twinning window closes in September, and remembrance projects follow in October, after which the Education and Culture Executive Agency assesses and selects. The grants will not make headlines. But in places like Aachen, they help keep alive the quiet, local version of European unity that the bigger institutions tend to take for granted.




