Brussels: The European Commission has cleared two of the last procedural hurdles before its deforestation law takes hold, adopting a delegated act and an implementing act on 13 July that redraw the rulebook’s product scope and switch on the system companies will use to prove compliance. The measures sharpen a regulation that reaches deep into supply chains for cattle, cocoa, coffee, palm oil, rubber, soy and wood.
The deforestation regulation bars firms from selling these commodities in the EU unless they can trace them to land that stayed forest-free after December 2020. Large and medium operators must comply from 30 December 2026. Micro and small firms gain until 30 June 2027.
What the delegated act moves in and out
The delegated act rewrites Annex I, the list that pins down which processed goods fall inside the net. Brussels pulled several items out. Cattle hides, skins and leather now sit outside the scope, alongside retreaded tyres, soybean seeds for sowing, some rubber goods, conveyor belts and vehicle and aircraft seats.
Other products move in. Soluble coffee and a range of palm oil derivatives now count as covered goods, closing gaps that traders could have used to route commodities around the controls. The Commission also carved out targeted exemptions for waste, second-hand goods, packaging material, laboratory samples and inputs that make medicines.
These edits matter because Annex I decides who files paperwork. A firm that imports leather car seats now escapes the due-diligence duty, while a roaster that blends soluble coffee does not. The net widens in some corners and narrows in others rather than simply tightening across the board.
How the information system fits in
The implementing act sets the technical rules for the EUDR Information System. Operators and traders will lodge due-diligence statements and simplified declarations through this portal, generating a reference number that follows the goods along the chain. National authorities draw on the same system when they pick consignments for checks.
Both acts now face a two-month scrutiny window. The European Parliament and the Council can veto either text, yet neither body can amend a line. That binary choice tends to favour the Commission, since lawmakers rarely reject a package this close to an application date they have already pushed back once.
The stakes reach well beyond Europe. Producer countries from Brazil to Indonesia argue that the compliance burden penalises smallholders, and several trading partners have pressed for lighter obligations. By trimming Annex I and simplifying declarations, the Commission answers some of that criticism without conceding the core principle that market access depends on clean, geolocated supply chains.
Businesses still face a compressed timetable. Firms must map suppliers, collect plot coordinates and test their data against the portal before the December deadline. Companies that treated earlier delays as a reprieve now confront a scope that is settled and a system that is live.
The December start will test whether traceability at this scale can work in practice. If the portal handles the volume and checks catch tainted goods, the EU gains a template other jurisdictions may copy. If it stalls, pressure for another postponement will build fast. Either way, the 13 July measures leave little doubt that the deforestation regulation is moving from theory into enforcement.




