Sofia: The European Commission stepped up legal pressure on three member states this month, sending reasoned opinions to Bulgaria and Poland and a letter of formal notice to Portugal for failing to correctly transpose EU rules guaranteeing the right to legal aid for suspects and accused persons. The action, part of the Commission June 2026 infringements package, targets gaps in the safeguards that ensure a fair trial for those who cannot afford a lawyer.
The legal-aid cases
The cases concern the EU Legal Aid Directive, which obliges national authorities to provide free legal assistance to people facing criminal proceedings who lack sufficient means, and who would otherwise be unable to mount an effective defence. A reasoned opinion is the second stage of an EU infringement procedure, one step short of referral to the Court of Justice, while a letter of formal notice opens the process and invites a reply.
Bulgaria and Poland now have two months to bring their rules into line, or the Commission may take the legal aid infringement cases to Luxembourg. Portugal, at the earlier formal-notice stage, has the same window to respond before the procedure escalates.
A wider rights sweep
The procedural-rights cases sat alongside several other fundamental-rights actions in the same package.
- The Commission opened a procedure against Spain over a scheme forcing hotels, platforms and car-rental firms to hand travellers personal data to a central database, which Brussels considers excessive under the Law Enforcement Directive.
- Reasoned opinions and formal notices on legal aid went to Portugal, Bulgaria and Poland.
- Brussels flagged retention of the data for three years as disproportionate to the stated law-enforcement purpose.
What the Commission says
The Commission frames effective legal aid as a precondition for the rule of law, not an administrative formality.
The right to legal aid is essential to guarantee effective access to justice and a fair trial for everyone facing criminal proceedings, the Commission stressed in setting out the cases.
It argues that without properly transposed rules, defendants in some countries risk facing the state in court without adequate representation.
Background
The Legal Aid Directive is one of six measures in the EU roadmap on procedural rights, built to give practical effect to the fair-trial guarantees in the Charter of Fundamental Rights. The Commission publishes its enforcement decisions in regular monthly batches; the latest set was detailed in the June infringements package, which spanned data protection, energy and the single market as well as criminal-justice safeguards. A fuller breakdown of the June 2026 infringement decisions shows the Commission pressing on both fundamental rights and rule-of-law transposition.
What happens next
If the targeted governments fail to respond satisfactorily within the deadline, the Commission can refer them to the Court of Justice, which can ultimately impose financial penalties. The cases add to a steady drumbeat of EU action on justice standards, where Brussels has increasingly used infringement powers to defend the right to legal aid and other fair-trial protections across the bloc. Civil-society groups have long warned that uneven transposition leaves defendants in some member states with weaker protections than their counterparts elsewhere, undermining the promise of a single area of justice. For Sofia and Warsaw, the next move now rests on whether they amend their national codes before the clock runs out.




