Rome: The Competitiveness Compass, the Commission’s structural framework for the current institutional cycle, has entered its operational phase with the publication of the first sectoral action plans on simplification and the consolidation of the Single Market enforcement architecture. The Italian Ministry of Enterprise and Made in Italy, whose representation on the Council’s Competitiveness configuration has been particularly active during the present semester, has emphasised the operational importance of effective enforcement of existing Single Market rules over the development of new regulatory frameworks.
The Compass, presented by President von der Leyen in January, identifies three structural priorities: closing the innovation gap, decarbonising the economy while maintaining competitiveness, and reducing strategic dependencies. The operationalisation of these priorities has occurred through a sequence of horizontal and sectoral initiatives, including the Clean Industrial Deal, the Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform, and the Defence Readiness Omnibus, alongside the regulatory simplification agenda whose first omnibus package is expected before the summer recess.
Single Market integration remains incomplete. The European Court of Auditors’ 2025 special report on Single Market enforcement documented persistent fragmentation in services markets, professional qualifications, and digital service delivery. Goods markets, by contrast, demonstrate substantially higher degrees of effective integration, reflecting the more developed mutual recognition framework and the more mature enforcement architecture under the New Legislative Framework. The asymmetry between goods and services integration represents one of the structural inefficiencies that the Competitiveness Compass seeks to address.
The innovation gap, identified by the Draghi report and reinforced by the Letta analysis of the Single Market, remains the most consequential structural challenge facing the European economy. The Compass’s response combines increased public investment in research and innovation, regulatory facilitation of scaling for innovative firms, and capital markets reforms that aim to mobilise European savings into productive investment. The Savings and Investments Union, presented by the Commission in March, addresses the capital markets dimension of this challenge.
Industrial policy, long a contested domain of European economic policy, has been substantially recalibrated. The Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform consolidates funding streams into priority technology areas, including semiconductors, biotechnologies, and clean technologies. State aid rules, traditionally a constraint on national industrial policy ambitions, have been modulated through the Important Projects of Common European Interest framework and through emergency state aid frameworks responsive to recent economic disruptions.
The implementation question is consequential. Implementation depends on Member State commitment to a level playing field across the Single Market and on the Commission’s capacity to enforce existing rules effectively. Both have been periodically tested. The Compass’s emphasis on enforcement, articulated in the simplification omnibus and in the strengthened role of the Single Market Programme, addresses the implementation challenge directly.
The Council’s Competitiveness configuration will hold its next formal meeting on 30 May. The agenda includes the simplification omnibus, the implementation of the Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform, and the preparatory discussions on the post-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework’s competitiveness instruments. The Commission’s report on Single Market enforcement, published in April, will frame the political discussion.
The European Parliament’s Committee on Industry, Research and Energy will adopt its position on the simplification omnibus in June. Inter-institutional negotiations on the package are expected to extend into the autumn. The political appetite for ambitious Single Market reform remains broadly aligned across the institutions; the technical details of regulatory simplification, by contrast, will require sustained negotiation.




