Naples: The European Public Prosecutor’s Office spent much of 2025 chasing money that was supposed to rebuild the continent and instead disappeared into shell firms, inflated invoices and outright theft. Its annual report, released in the spring, put a startling figure on the problem. By the end of the year the office held 512 active investigations tied to the bloc’s pandemic recovery fund, involving nearly two thousand suspects and an estimated five billion euros in suspected damage.
The pace is accelerating rather than easing. Prosecutors opened almost three hundred new investigations into the Recovery and Resilience Facility last year, more than double the number launched in 2024. That spike is not necessarily a sign of more crime; it reflects a maturing office that has finally built the cross-border reach to spot fraud as the cash flows out. The recovery fund was designed for speed, pushing grants and cheap loans to member states with light front-end checks, and that design is precisely what fraudsters exploited.
Some of the money is being clawed back. National courts granted freezing orders worth 1.13 billion euros in the office’s cases during 2025, locking down assets that prosecutors argue should ultimately return to public coffers. Whether seizure translates into recovery depends on slow national proceedings, and the office has long complained that once a case leaves its hands the momentum can stall in domestic courts that treat European money as someone else’s problem.
The picture from the older anti-fraud body is steadier but no less sobering. The European Anti-Fraud Office, which investigates irregularities rather than prosecuting them, recommended the recovery of almost six hundred million euros over the year. It closed 209 investigations while opening 254 new ones, and it estimated that another eighteen million euros in spending had been protected before it could be lost. Across the past decade the office reckons it has helped retrieve or shield roughly 6.8 billion euros, a reminder that fraud against the common budget is a permanent feature rather than a passing scandal.
What unsettles auditors is the gap between the sums under investigation and the sums actually returned. A freezing order is a promise, not a payment, and the recovery fund will keep disbursing into 2026 even as the cases pile up. Investigators warn that the most sophisticated schemes route money through chains of contractors across several countries, so that no single national authority sees the whole picture. The prosecutor’s office was created to close exactly that blind spot, yet it remains underfunded relative to the scale of the cash it polices.
The political stakes are rising as governments negotiate the next long-term budget, which leans heavily on new common borrowing and new spending instruments. Each fresh euro of shared money is also a fresh target, and finance ministries that resent central oversight will find it harder to argue against stronger controls when the headline damage figure has five zeros after it. The lesson of the recovery fund is uncomfortable but simple. Money handed out quickly is money that must be watched closely, and the watching has only just caught up with the spending.




